AJP - GI AJP: Renal Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (November 25, 2008). doi:10.1152/ajpgi.90558.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
296/2/G295    most recent
90558.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sweetser, S.
Right arrow Articles by Zinsmeister, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sweetser, S.
Right arrow Articles by Zinsmeister, A. R.
Submitted on September 19, 2008
Revised on November 19, 2008
Accepted on November 19, 2008

Effect of a Chloride Channel Activator, Lubiprostone, on Colonic Sensory and Motor Functions in Healthy Subjects

Seth Sweetser, Irene A. Busciglio, Michael Camilleri1*, Adil E. Bharucha2, Lawrence A. Szarka1, Athanasios Papathanasopoulos3, Duane D. Burton, Deborah J. Eckert, and Alan R. Zinsmeister4

1 Mayo Clinic
2 College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
3 Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
4 Mayo Clinic College of Medicine

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: camilleri.michael{at}mayo.edu.

Lubiprostone, a bicyclic fatty acid chloride channel activator, is efficacious in treatment of chronic constipation and constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. The study aim was to compare effects of lubiprostone and placebo on colonic sensory and motor functions in humans. In double-blind, randomized fashion, 60 healthy adults received three oral doses of placebo or 24 µg lubiprostone per day in a parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. A barostat-manometry tube was placed in the left colon by flexible sigmoidoscopy and fluoroscopy. We measured treatment effects on colonic sensation and motility with validated methods, with the following endpoints: colonic compliance, fasting and postprandial tone and motility indices, pain thresholds, and sensory ratings to distensions. Among participants receiving lubiprostone or placebo, 26/30 and 28/30, respectively completed the study. There were no overall effects of lubiprostone on compliance, fasting tone, motility indices or sensation. However, there was a treatment by gender interaction effect for compliance (p=0.02), with lubiprostone inducing decreased fasting compliance in females (p=0.06) and an overall decreased colonic tone contraction after a standard meal relative to fasting tone (p=0.014), with greater effect in females (p<0.01). Numerical differences of first sensation and pain thresholds (p=0.11 in females) in the 2 groups were not significant. We concluded that oral lubiprostone 24 µg does not increase colonic motor function. The finding of decreased colonic compliance and decreased postprandial colonic tone in females suggest that motor effects are unlikely to cause accelerated colonic transit with lubiprostone, though they may facilitate laxation. Effects of lubiprostone on sensitivity deserve further study.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.