AJP - GI Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (July 24, 2008). doi:10.1152/ajpgi.90322.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
295/3/G614    most recent
ajpgi.90322.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J. D.
Submitted on May 4, 2008
Revised on July 2, 2008
Accepted on July 20, 2008

Electroacupuncture Improves Impaired Gastric Motility and Slow Waves Induced by Rectal Distension in Dogs

Jie Chen1, Geng-Qing Song2, Jieyun Yin3, Thillai Koothan, and Jiande DZ Chen3*

1 Union hospital of Tongji Medical University
2 Veterans Research Foundation, VA Medical Center
3 University of Texas Medical Branch

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jianchen{at}utmb.edu.

Rectal distension (RD)induce upper GI symptoms. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects and mechanisms of RD on gastric slow waves ( GSW) and motor activity, to investigate the effects and mechanisms of electroacupuncture (EA) on GSW and motor activity. Methods: Eight female hound dogs implanted with gastric serosal electrodes and a gastric fistula were studied in six separate sessions. Antral motility, gastric slow waves, heart rate variability and rectal pressure were evaluated for above purposes. Results: 1) RD at a volume of 120ml suppressed antral motility significantly. Guanethidine blocked the inhibitory effect of RD. EA was able to restore the suppressed antral contraction induced by RD (16.6±1.7 vs. 8.0±1.4, p<0.001). Naloxone partially blocked the effect of EA on the antral contraction 2) RD reduced the percentage of normal GSW that was increased with EA. The effects of EA on the GSW were no longer observed at the presence of naloxone. 3) EA did not show any significant effect on rectal pressure, suggesting that the ameliorating effects of EA on RD-induced impaired gastric motility was not attributed to a decrease in rectal pressure. 4) EA increased the vagal activity suppressed by RD. Conclusions: RD inhibits postprandial gastric motility and impairs GSW in dogs, and the inhibitory effects are mediated via the adrenergic pathways. EA is able to restore the RD-induced impaired GSW and motor activities possibly by enhancing vagal activity, and partially mediated via the opioid pathway. EA may have a therapeutic potential for functional gastrointestinal disorders.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.