AJP - GI Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (July 31, 2008). doi:10.1152/ajpgi.90390.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
295/3/G641    most recent
ajpgi.90390.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, S. V.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wu, S. V.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, L. J.
Submitted on June 20, 2008
Revised on July 15, 2008
Accepted on July 28, 2008

Effects of cholecystokinin-58 on Type 1 cholecystokinin receptor function and regulation. Receptor binding, activation, internalization and oligomerization

S. Vincent Wu1, Kaleeckal G Harikumar2, Rebecca J Burgess2, Joseph R Reeve, Jr3, and Laurence J. Miller2*

1 VA West Los Angeles Medical Center\
2 Mayo Clinic
3 CURE: Digestive Diseases Research Center

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: miller{at}mayo.edu.

Cholecystokinin, like many peptide hormones, is present as multiple molecular forms. CCK-58 has been identified as the dominant form in the circulation, while most of the studies of CCK-receptor interactions have been performed with CCK-8. Despite both sharing the pharmacophoric region of CCK, representing its carboxyl-terminal heptapeptide-amide, studies in vivo have demonstrated biological diversity of action of the two peptides, with CCK-58, but not CCK-8, stimulating pancreatic fluid secretion and lengthening the interval between meals. Here, we have directly studied the ability of these two CCK peptides to bind to the Type 1 CCK receptor and to stimulate it to elicit an intracellular calcium response. The calcium response relative to receptor occupation was identical for CCK-58 and CCK-8, with the longer peptide binding with approximately five-fold lower affinity. We also examined the ability of the two peptides to elicit receptor internalization using morphologic techniques and to disrupt the constitutive oligomerization of the CCK receptor using receptor bioluminescence resonance energy transfer. Here, both full agonist peptides had similar effects on these regulatory processes. These data suggest that both molecular forms of CCK act at the CCK1 receptor quite similarly and elicit similar regulatory processes for that receptor, suggesting that the differences in biological activity observed in vivo most likely reflect differences in the clearance and/or metabolism of these long and short forms of CCK peptides.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.